Subaru WRX Forum banner
1 - 20 of 32 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
The WRX Wagon is the best car made for ME at ANY price. I'm not saying its the best for YOU. This statement is based on the following criteria. You are requested to follow this criteria when refuting my claim.

1. I can only afford to have one car. I know I said any price, but I mean any price for a single car - not any price for a stable of cars. Plus I live in the US, so cars not sold in the US aren't eligible. Though I'd like to hear about them.

2. I REALLY like performance. I must have a high performance vehicle. It has to handle, accelerate and brake extremely well. I drive a lot of twisty mountain rods, so how it handles these is the litmus test for me, not a drag strip, auto-x course or even a wide-open road course.

3. I live in snow country and do a lot of skiing. Plus I really like to drive fast in the snow - for me this goes along with #2. If it doesn't kick butt in the snow it's not for me.

4. I have a family including a large dog. I have to have a practical car that can carry a lot of stuff.

So lessee - #3 immediately rules out anything that is RWD. You can get away with RWD in the snow, but it will never "kick butt". "Oh it has traction control and will get you where you need to go" doesn't cut it. FWD fits the bill, but I think goes against #2. Not that there aren't some great FWD cars out there, just that they really start to struggle in the handling department over 200hp. As far as I know, there isn't a FWD car quicker than the WRX sold in America.

#4 basically rules out Coupes, Sedans and two seaters. I guess a big sedan with fold-down rear seats would work but not as well.

The WRX fills number 2 quite nicely, despite what some haters have to say. You think the WRX is slow and handles poorly? I say you're just plain wrong. Sure there are cars that are faster and handle better, but not many! A few mods and it can take on just about anything on the road.

The WRX fills #3 better than just about any car out there. Lessee, a couple of Audis, a couple of BMWs. That's about it as far as anything that is performance oriented at all. I've never heard good things about Carrera 4s in the snow - though I bet it would do well if you put some skinny tires on it. Trucks don't fill any of the other requirements plus the roads I drive on are plowed so I never have to go through more than a foot of snow - ground clearance isn't a problem. And even in the snow, the high center of gravity hurts a truck's handling. Give me an AWD car any day.

So about the only thing that comes to mind for competition is the Audi S4 Avant. But while the sedan has comparable performance to the WRX, the Avant (wagon) is A LOT heavier, and as a result, performance suffers. I think there are a couple of new Audis that are as fast or faster than the WRX, but they are quite large, and for me that goes against parameter #2. Luxury is not on my list of parameters. The WRX already has too many heavy gadgets for me. I don't want any more.

Nothing else can compete with the total package.

And all for only $24,000. A price that I can actually afford in reality. :D :D :D

Chris
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
293 Posts
Since you said U.S., I'll agree. Other than that... STi wagon!!!! If you add in luxury, I'd say Audi RS4.

I ordered my wagon to be like a cheap S4 with hopes to compare it to an RS4 some day. The main components that the WRX lacks is leather and sunroof. Ordered them on my wagon. The only thing I won't have is semi-automatic air, but those have always been a pain to me. The press info has said that the quality of materials used on the interior has been improved, so maybe that will make it even closer. For US, take a 23,000 wagon and add a 1,000 aftermarket sunroof (if you really want it) and leather from a group buy for 600 to get a total of 24,600. Aftermarket to help performance is reasonable as well.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
339 Posts
If the WRX was a Vampire, the WRX Wagon would be the Daywalker.

All of its strengths, none of its weaknesses.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
416 Posts
koyokid said:
If the WRX was a Vampire, the WRX Wagon would be the Daywalker.

All of its strengths, none of its weaknesses.
Inaccurate! I have NO need for a wagon! The additional weight (as little as it may be would be a negative side-effect for me). So your statement may be true for you, but not for me!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
339 Posts
campbell said:


Inaccurate! I have NO need for a wagon! The additional weight (as little as it may be would be a negative side-effect for me). So your statement may be true for you, but not for me!
Click Here
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 · (Edited)
The Sedan and wagon are awfully close. Some say the extra weight in back of the Wagon helps the balance (it does) and improves handling (mmmm....possibly). I only weigh 160 so I figure it averages out. It's only 80lbs - my car probably has more snow on it than that right now!

Certainly if you never need to haul anything you don't need the wagon, but here's what I do with mine:

http://www.clubwrx.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=9589&highlight=wagon

Can't think of any small advantage the Sedan might have that outweighs THAT! But again, if an MR2 spider works as well for you as any car, you don't need the wagon.

I definitely agree with Powerwagon - if there was an STi wagon currently available, THAT would be the car to have, and nothing would even come close for me. I'd be standing in a puddle of drool right now! I don't think they have a new-gen STi wagon yet though, do they? Maybe in Japan? I know Oz and Europe haven't gotten it. A Liberty/Legacy B4 would be in the running if they sold that here.

Chris
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·

·
Registered
Joined
·
339 Posts
campbell said:


You guys can take your dead vampire and SHOVE IT!



Yes, the STi wagon would be the end all, be all for me. There's just something about having your cake and eating it too.:D

The wagon is the reason I have a WRX. Otherwise my wife would have not approved. With our wagon, we can take people, cargo, groceries etc., and all the while still have the speed, handling and fun of the WRX. My wife can fit all of her massage equipment in the back w/o taking up any passenger space. The wagon was really the only choice for us. But even if I was single, I'd still have the wagon. I love sport hatchbacks, and the WRX wagon is everything that I love wrapped up in one vehicle.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
1,263 Posts
mmmm wagons!!
I would give up mine for the Audi RS6 wagon

here is a clipping of details on the engine alone....

High-tech lightweight aluminium V8, displacing 4.2 litres. Five-valves for each cylinder, forty in all. Twin turbochargers. High lift cams with hydraulic lifters. Variable magnesium intake manifolds. The latest in electronic engine management. Output of 450bhp at just 5700 rpm. Torque of 560 Nm from 1950 to 5600 rpm.


a magazine that drove the car referred to it having a torque table rather than a torque curve!!!!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 · (Edited)
Yeah definitely badass - it'd be tough, they're a bit large for my tastes. The R6 Avant wouldn't quite cut it, but an RS6 Avant - that'd be tough to turn down. Not in the US yet, so my point stands. Tenuously!

So is that STi Japan only, or what?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Just looked at the Audi USA web site and they aren't listing an S4! What's with that??
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
1,263 Posts
GV27 said:
Yeah definitely badass - it'd be tough, they're a bit large for my tastes. The R6 Avant wouldn't quite cut it, but an RS6 Avant - that'd be tough to turn down. Not in the US yet, so my point stands. Tenuously!

So is that STi Japan only, or what?
I was actually agreeing with you - nothing else in the US would get me to give up the WRX.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
339 Posts
The word is that the only flavor STi we'll be getting will be the sedan. That, my friend, will be a shame.

Does anyone know any figures of how many WRX wagons were sold compared to sedans? Just curious.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
339 Posts
WRX>MUSTANG said:
How much legroom does the wagon have?
Wagon Legroom: front/rear 42.9/33.7

Sedan Legroom: front/rear 42.9/33.0

Wagon Headroom: front/rear 39.7/37.3

Sedan Headroom: front/rear 38.6/36.7
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,539 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
Just looked at the Audi USA web site and they aren't listing an S4! What's with that??
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
124 Posts
I have so say that the WRX wagon is the best looking wagon out there period in my opinion
And I'm annoyed theat here in oz we don't get STi wagons or B4 wagons (these are fantastic)
another wagon to die for is the Nissan one (can't remember the name but is stupidly expensive and is pretty much a GTR skyline Wagon

That covers car we and you can't get

I agree that the Audi is probably the closest contender but at that price you could get 2 WRX wagons or a WRX wagon and a sedan :D

Bang for buck the rexy flat out anihilates all competition :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
293 Posts
From what I understand, there will be no more STi wagon for 2003. No big deal. If we can't get it, then nobody else should either!!!! :mad: j/k. Seriously, I would have liked a 2003 STi wagon to be made just so I could buy the seats and carpet. That would be cool enough to sell my leathers.

By the way, why can't we get flares at least like the RS6? I'm still hoping that somebody will make a replica of the SYMS cf flares. They remind me of the RS4/6 cars. A good thing for whoever makes this (hopefully) is that it will fit the bug and blob eyed imprezas.
http://forums.i-club.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=2725699

http://forums.i-club.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=2726016

edit: linking didn't work.
 
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
Top