Subaru WRX Forum banner
1 - 20 of 59 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
1,379 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Nissan 350Z stats out!

According to the August Car & Driver:

287hp, 274 lb/ft
0-60: 5.4
1/4: [email protected]
Top Speed: 156
Skidpad: .88 with moderate understeer
Weight: 3322lbs

Cover image:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,155 Posts
I would actually expect it to be a little quicker than that. Perhaps your right on bedabi, it just needs some stickier rubber. I like it, but I still like the rex better. Just my opinion, of course.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
280 Posts
Not bad. I don't like the design though, the old Z designs were the best. I also think they should have given it a little more power. How much is it? Like $30,000?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
99 Posts
I wonder if those are the numbers for the track model, which comes with better tires and brakes. With torque and HP like that, it should be able to get in 13's.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
1,379 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 · (Edited)
Thanks Bed. I originally posted this thread to OT, then when I went back to add the article link, this thread appeared to be gone. So I assumed that I was having a "senior moment" and had actually posted it on some other forum, and so reposted it in OT. :rolleyes: I guess the mods moved it without a notice, then killed my duplicate. Sorry about the confusion!!

BTW, the majority of the folks in the Z community are mad, mad, mad about these stats. Despite the fact that Nissan promised only 260hp originally, rumors floated around that it would be 315hp, and it seems a majority of the Z folks decided to bank on the 315. :eek: Oops. The 1/4 is .1 behind the oft-quoted 14.0 for the S2K, and, obviously, the weight is a little high. Some of those who made pre-orders are talking about dropping their preorder in protest. Guess it goes to show, some people will be unhappy no manner what. :rolleyes:
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
1,379 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Woops, looks like Car and Driver took down the article. Apparently they violated the Nissan press agreement saying they couldn't release any data until (IIRC) July 3.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,501 Posts
I want the "TRACK" version of the 350Z for $34,000. I was just looking over the stats. The 350Z is the next super-value sports car. It will do for sports cars what the WRX did for sports sedans. I'm seriously considering trading in my WRX!!! With a little work, this car would be sooooooo goddam fast!

-Jim
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
198 Posts
Yet another case of Nissan over-stating HP claims. I'm willing to bet if you threw it on the dyno it would get the same figures (190s-200s) we have seen with the 02 Maxima (essentially the same engine). I do recall Nissan's chief engineer saying this car would beat or meet the E46 M3. Well from what I recall the M3 runs a very low 13 through the 1/4 mile.
The saving grace is the fact that Nismo is on it's way to US shores, so we will begin seeing turbo kits and all other sorts of goodies.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
310 Posts
Re: Nissan 350Z stats out!

AutoXJunkie said:
According to the August Car & Driver:

287hp, 274 lb/ft
0-60: 5.4
1/4: [email protected]
Top Speed: 156
Skidpad: .88 with moderate understeer
Weight: 3322lbs

Cover image:
I knew it is going to be bad a**, my first stick car was a 240Z :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
202 Posts
will be interesting here at work. My old zxtt buddies each have a track model on order along with keeping their old TT's ( both currently getting monster buidups..one to 650rwhp and the other to ~1Krwhp ). But they have been ragging on me ever since I sold my TT and bought the WRX. Plenty of friendly smack talk has been laid down and I have running bets with both of them that I will kick their Z's butts in acceleration to 100, cornering and braking ( the new ones of course, not the monster tt's )...I am already planning on using their cash towards a set of teins LOL.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
82 Posts
Actually, Nissan has been telling the Z Community 280 HP from the beginning. What they wouldn't tell us was the Weight. Orginally we were quoted 2800, then 2950, now it's 3140. And the track model isn't what was said. Instead of being a stripped down model with all the performance goodies, its a loaded model with better brakes and tires. It's one fo the heaviest options there are. You would be better of getting the base model and upgrading the tires (kinda of like the old Mustang LX's were faster that the GT's).

The price was better than hoped for though, You can actually buy one for just over 26K. And the FM Chassis has turned out to be a gem. At Houston the weight distribution was almost exactly 50/50.

The hoursepower figure seems to be right on the Money given the weight of the car. Take 287 and 3300 lbs for the track model.

There will be full reviews on Car and Driver, Motor Trend, and Sport Z after this weekend. (Yes, there was a media black out until July 3rd).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
176 Posts
Yet another NICE Naturally Asperated car... that will be sucking air up here at 6000ft. above sea level. Mark my words if it does in fact run a 14.1 at sea level it will be lucky to pull off a 15.1 up here ... [sigh]... BUT at least I have my "not as affected by altitude turbo WRX" :D

Cheers... the only car that concerns me is the Turbo Lancer when it arrives... or any other big hp turbo car for that matter.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
82 Posts
SobeWRX said:
for that kind of money i would rather invest in the mazda rx-8 better looks, similar performance 4 seater....
I am going to reserve Judgement on that until I see a RX8 in person.

I've ridden in the 350Z, so I can't wait to make the comparison.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
55 Posts
Re: Nissan 350Z stats out!

AutoXJunkie said:
According to the August Car & Driver:

287hp, 274 lb/ft
0-60: 5.4
1/4: [email protected]
Top Speed: 156
Skidpad: .88 with moderate understeer
Weight: 3322lbs
Trap speed indicates it might have more in it, but the ET isn't that great. I was expecting more given all the hype. Looks like a good match for a Mustang GT.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
keep in mind that magazine 1/4 mile times generally SUCK for all cars. I think with a good driver the Z should get in the 13s, but i guess we'll just have to wait.

btw, about the RX-8, i love the looks of the car but there is NO torque. Bummer :( , the interrior in that car is the sweetest around IMO. Remember, the only replacement for displacement is FI (which mazda apparently forgot).

later
 
1 - 20 of 59 Posts
Top