ClubWRX Forum banner

1 - 20 of 21 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,369 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Subaru World Rally Team managing director Richard Taylor believes the manufacturer would quit the World Rally Championship if a two-wheel-drive future is enforced by the FIA.

Autosport magazine this week reports that the sport's governing body will consider whether to limit the main class of the WRC to two-wheel-drive cars from 2010.

A decision is expected at the next meeting of the World Motorsport Council on March 26, and Taylor thinks Subaru would walk away from the WRC if they couldn't field their four-wheel-drive cars.

"Subaru's market is four-wheel-drive," he told Autosport. "If this change came it could be the trigger for Subaru to pull out, they wouldn't be remotely interested in it."

Autosport read more
 

·
Would Never, Ever Say Something Bad About an Admin
Joined
·
5,780 Posts
What a stupid idea. they should just run WRC on paved ovals too.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
Subaru World Rally Team managing director Richard Taylor believes the manufacturer would quit the World Rally Championship if a two-wheel-drive future is enforced by the FIA.

Autosport magazine this week reports that the sport's governing body will consider whether to limit the main class of the WRC to two-wheel-drive cars from 2010.

A decision is expected at the next meeting of the World Motorsport Council on March 26, and Taylor thinks Subaru would walk away from the WRC if they couldn't field their four-wheel-drive cars.

"Subaru's market is four-wheel-drive," he told Autosport. "If this change came it could be the trigger for Subaru to pull out, they wouldn't be remotely interested in it."

Autosport read more

Dear FIA,
***** are you retarted? :mad:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,201 Posts
Subaru World Rally Team managing director Richard Taylor believes the manufacturer would quit the World Rally Championship if a two-wheel-drive future is enforced by the FIA.
 

·
Super Moderator (Actually a SuperSpy)
Joined
·
29,234 Posts
I actually am OK with a 2WD rallycar. Some of the greatest rallies ever have been contested and won in spectacular fashion by 2WD cars.

Subaru's objections, after all, concern marketing of road cars, not competition car performance.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,158 Posts
I actually am OK with a 2WD rallycar. Some of the greatest rallies ever have been contested and won in spectacular fashion by 2WD cars.

Subaru's objections, after all, concern marketing of road cars, not competition car performance.
but then we lose our rally heritage and are stuck driving justanother japanese car.
 

·
Super Moderator (Actually a SuperSpy)
Joined
·
29,234 Posts
but then we lose our rally heritage and are stuck driving justanother japanese car.
I don't think we lose anything though. The cars we've bought already won't change, and rally heritage isn't limited to AWD cars. When I see a MkI or MkII Escort, a Manta, a 131, or a Starlet I think rally heritage -- because after all it's the heritage is there despite the RWD. Likewise, FWD cars like the Mini Cooper have rally heritage and are revered.

Since Subaru have convinced people in specific markets that their focus is AWD and boxer motors (despite selling cars that feature neither in other markets) it's likely they'll continue making AWD Imprezas and Legacies so if we still want a turbo AWD Subaru we could just go buy a new one I'd guess.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,850 Posts
I'm not really big into rallying but it seems to m there have been some pretty cool RWD rally cars. Lancia Stratos anyone?




I guess Subaru could just make a RWD rally car and paste AWD logos all over it to "pretend" kind of like those nascar cars that have the Ford Fusion grille painted on. :rotfl:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,158 Posts
I don't think we lose anything though. The cars we've bought already won't change, and rally heritage isn't limited to AWD cars. When I see a MkI or MkII Escort, a Manta, a 131, or a Starlet I think rally heritage -- because after all it's the heritage is there despite the RWD. Likewise, FWD cars like the Mini Cooper have rally heritage and are revered.

Since Subaru have convinced people in specific markets that their focus is AWD and boxer motors (despite selling cars that feature neither in other markets) it's likely they'll continue making AWD Imprezas and Legacies so if we still want a turbo AWD Subaru we could just go buy a new one I'd guess.
ford still has their rally heritage...you did see what they did last year, right?:tongue:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,201 Posts
ford still has their rally heritage...you did see what they did last year, right?:tongue:
you mean in the AWD Focus? :rotfl:
 

·
SuperNova
Joined
·
11,904 Posts
I'd buy a rwd STI. It would mean the installation of a beefier rear diff and I fully support that. Smoky non trans breaking burnouts FTW.
 

·
Super Moderator (Actually a SuperSpy)
Joined
·
29,234 Posts
Talk of a 2wd WRC is not new. I remember similar discussions after the demise of Group B, and even during the demise of Group A -- keep in mind that even though WRC cars are still called Group A, the rules are quite different now than in the 90s.

Anyone that's heard an Escort or a Nissan 240 RS grunting as it goes up a hillside knows the sound is magic. Although speeds would drop if we moved to a 2WD format, I still believe the format itself could provide enough challenge and spectacle to keep the crowds coming to stages and keep people talking about rallying -- even if, or perhaps especially if turbos are also banned. C. McRae once said that he loves the sound and sight of the Group 5 cars (no turbos, no AWD) and I have to agree. They provided excitement that the WRC could still use today.

The pic is a RWD atmospherically aspirated Opel Manta (a Group B car, but not a monster -- among the last of its kind before turbo AWD).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
224 Posts
so what your saying is they want to turn rally racing into autocross?? but seriously, If you want to make a 2WD class fine but don't throw out AWD
 

·
Super Moderator (Actually a SuperSpy)
Joined
·
29,234 Posts
Keep in mind that their intentions and their stated intentions may not be the same -- I have always thought that FIA, dating back to the FISA days, does what it can to keep F1 a cash cow even if it means taking measures to limit the appeal of rallying.

By eliminating AWD they may state they want to simplify the series and give it broader appeal, but they may actually want to bleed the series to keep F1 a source of revenue. My belief and hope is that their stated goal is actually realistic -- by turning rallying back into what it once was or what people once hoped it will be, they'll make it more approachable for teams and more popular.

To field a top local team today requires an unrealistic budget for most enterprises. It used to be that an organized privateer could take on works teams, but this hasn't been the case in ages.

Pic is ex-Vatanen Ford Escort RS as seen in the RAC.
 

·
Super Moderator (Actually a SuperSpy)
Joined
·
29,234 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
3,385 Posts
I'm kinda hoping this ends up in a compromise. The AWD systems of today's top WRC cars are damn near as complex as the inner workings of the female human brain at this point. If they made the teams stick to what the road going cars are rocking (mmmmm, homologation), I think we'd get better road cars and more interest in the WRC. Am I wrong?

Otherwise, leave it the F alone. The sport is not in that great of a shape as it is.

Edit: Remember when racing pushed the development of new technology in the auto industry? Now we have to take another step backwards??
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
Top