Joined
·
773 Posts
Reliability, driver engagement, luxury, acceleration, and quarter mile, highway merging and 40-80 acceleration. It's also worth mentioning the new mustangs kill it on a road course. In general, the sti and WRX maintain a cult following of misinformation that leads people to a false sense of what they are.
As for winter, I driver rwd vehicles for years in an area where ice storms are frequent. The only people who have issues are the ones who want to have them.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Reliability, really? I can find 200k original equipment miles on mustangs all day long. Don't see many ejs out there in the same shape. For you to even argue the sti is more reliable in any stretch of the imagination is a laugh. Don't be that guy. The subarus are reliable for what they are, but they are not long term high mileage vehicles, mustangs are and can be in any trim.Having owned a Mustang GT ; not current generation , and from my experience with both the STi is a much better car all around . Sure the new generation Mustangs with long overdue IRS should be a very engaging car to drive sportingly . But where is the practicality ? Reliability , Mustang over STi , point me in the direction of your facts ? In real world driving it's not even close . 9 out of 10 bank robbers would agree :soapbox:
Enjoy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVyBaX6sCd4
Damn. I've been wrong all these years. I almost thought 'fun to drive' and 'better' were subjective terms.At being a fun to drive
Apparently I mistook four doors and all wheel drive for practicality, too. Damn.The STi is not anymore practical then a Mustang.
So you are telling me a lambos AWD makes it practical?Damn. I've been wrong all these years. I almost thought 'fun to drive' and 'better' were subjective terms.
Apparently I mistook four doors and all wheel drive for practicality, too. Damn.
This about sums it up. All these cars are great! They are kinda like ........... well I guess I better not say ityea mustangs are great if you fit inside them :<
I really don't understand your logic. How is the WRX any more practical than the STI? Are you speaking in regards to the transmission options?The STi is not anymore practical then a Mustang however the WRX is to a degree in my opinion.
I'm talking about the common sense practicality differences between the STI vs. Mustang GT. As most car guys do, I've already thought long term on my next car purchase anywhere from 2-4 years down the road. As much as I would love to be able to consider the Mustang, and trust me I have thought about it, it's not an option. The big reason being I plan on having a child around that time and it will be much easier to load crap in and out of a four door car similar to the STI vs. something like a Mustang, not to mention a car seat. The STI has obvious practicality advantages over the Mustang GT.So you are telling me a lambos AWD makes it practical?
Sure AWD can be practical, but just because a vehicle has it doesn't mean it is. Same with 4 doors. You can have all the doors you want but if the back seat only fits someone who is sans legs then again, that isn't that practical.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk