Now those are the two ends of the spectrum, large OEMs vs small shops. What happens in the middle?
HKS, Alpina & Brabus make & help develop some OEM parts but also sell built engines. How would their longevity compare?
Determining my Stage 2 WRX speed by comparing to other cars
61 - 67 of 67 Posts
Hmm, interesting. A few million is pretty normal for most industrial machines. I guess you are right about the lack of a middle ground. Looked up the suppliers out of curiosity and HKS is 60+ mn$ revenue. I'd rather have better tolerances than blueprinting, the latter doesn't do you much good for longevity.
The viper is glorious, no need to shit on one of the best cars ever made
. Would love to have one as a weekend car. Wouldn't drive it in the rain though, that was an experience I won't forget. On a more serious note, I'm more likely to trust rushed projects because managers have less time to fuck with the design. Every time I help friends fix VWs, the parts and design decisions remind me of projects lead by bean counters.
Over-engineering is a vague term and in most organizations it's a bad thing. It usually means that you have "technical directors" who are really penny pinchers with outdated technical experience questioning every design decision and cheapening every component. Worked on two projects simultaneously for the exact same type of machine. One was a 3 month project designed to be a stopgap and another was a 2 year project to make the long term product. The first one went fine and the stopgap is still in production with healthy profits and minimal quality issues.
The 2nd one started with a shocking number of brilliant ideas and great designs. After about 2-3 months of cost review meetings in which nearly every good idea was tossed because it cost 5-10% more, everyone had more or less checked out and was throwing in the cheapest and easiest designs they could think of just to avoid talking in those meetings. The end result was a nice looking machine that cost maybe 15% less than the stopgap but was scrapped because of quality problems that made some customers angry enough to try & sue us.
The viper is glorious, no need to shit on one of the best cars ever made
. Would love to have one as a weekend car. Wouldn't drive it in the rain though, that was an experience I won't forget. On a more serious note, I'm more likely to trust rushed projects because managers have less time to fuck with the design. Every time I help friends fix VWs, the parts and design decisions remind me of projects lead by bean counters.Over-engineering is a vague term and in most organizations it's a bad thing. It usually means that you have "technical directors" who are really penny pinchers with outdated technical experience questioning every design decision and cheapening every component. Worked on two projects simultaneously for the exact same type of machine. One was a 3 month project designed to be a stopgap and another was a 2 year project to make the long term product. The first one went fine and the stopgap is still in production with healthy profits and minimal quality issues.
The 2nd one started with a shocking number of brilliant ideas and great designs. After about 2-3 months of cost review meetings in which nearly every good idea was tossed because it cost 5-10% more, everyone had more or less checked out and was throwing in the cheapest and easiest designs they could think of just to avoid talking in those meetings. The end result was a nice looking machine that cost maybe 15% less than the stopgap but was scrapped because of quality problems that made some customers angry enough to try & sue us.
Yeah that was a joke comment, mimicking the response of Lancia fans
.That is a different problem. Better problem tbh, although I wish they would focus that overengineering on programming for a bit. Too many autos bog the engine at low revs until gas pedal is halfway down and then direcltly send it to redline.
61 - 67 of 67 Posts
