Cobb AP vs OpenECU (Tactrix/Romraider/ECUFlash)
In order to start tuning, you need to have an understanding of both EFI systems and how an internal combustion engine works. It's not difficult, per se, but it isn't something you'll learn overnight.
This is a discussion on Cobb AccessPORT + AccessTUNER race vs Open Source within the Tuning: Electronic Engine Management forums, part of the Tech & Modifying & General Repairs category; I know there are a bunch of posts about the cobb AP vs Open Source, but from what I have ...
I know there are a bunch of posts about the cobb AP vs Open Source, but from what I have found it seems like the information is outdated? I have seen that Cobb can't do data logging (which I believe it can now?) and you need a tuner to tune it for you.
From what I can gather with the AccessTUNER software this gives you essentially open source capability with cobb support? Is this true? Also how hard is it to learn AccessTUNER?
Cobb AP vs OpenECU (Tactrix/Romraider/ECUFlash)
In order to start tuning, you need to have an understanding of both EFI systems and how an internal combustion engine works. It's not difficult, per se, but it isn't something you'll learn overnight.
2005 WRX STi (Mods | Virtual Dyno)
Resident Tuner @ WTF Tuning, LLC
"Never trust anything that bleeds for a week and lives ..."
UNYSOC
So the fast polling that from raider can do. Is this a big deal? That is the only thing other than the price that open source does better than the Cobb ap right?
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Resolution is important; it allows you to get a better picture of what's going on. There are also a bunch of tools/utilities that also help with map-creation / log analyzing, but I know Cobb offers some (I'm just not familiar enough with them to comment on how extensive/useful they are).Originally Posted by SubaruWRC
2005 WRX STi (Mods | Virtual Dyno)
Resident Tuner @ WTF Tuning, LLC
"Never trust anything that bleeds for a week and lives ..."
UNYSOC
Does anyone have experience with both open source and accesstuner?
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
I think a big advantage for the COBB system (and why most tuners use it) is the real time/live tuning option. For most people doing their own cars the open source method of flash, log, adjust, and repeat is fine, but if I was doing it all the time for a business or something, I would want it real time. Especially on a dyno where time is money!
Opensource has a good community behind it and a lot of people that calibrate the engines themselves. The AP can be used for this too, it just costs more.
Would it be harder to try to tune my car from a stage 1 ots map or to tune it from scratch using open source?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
I've modified maps with ATR on other peoples computers (I'm unable to install ATR on my computer because I don't have an AP).Originally Posted by SubaruWRC
2005 WRX STi (Mods | Virtual Dyno)
Resident Tuner @ WTF Tuning, LLC
"Never trust anything that bleeds for a week and lives ..."
UNYSOC
So someone with open source tuning experience could help me with my ap?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Yes. It may take a little bit longer because some tables may be named differently or setup with different measurement units, but the concepts are the same. Someone familiar with Cobb should be able to give you an OpenECU tune, and vice versa.Originally Posted by SubaruWRC
The lead designer of OpenECU is now employed by Cobb, for what it's worth.
2005 WRX STi (Mods | Virtual Dyno)
Resident Tuner @ WTF Tuning, LLC
"Never trust anything that bleeds for a week and lives ..."
UNYSOC
Okay So I Flashed Stage 1.... Its amazing how quickly the turbo spools, I can feel it start to kick in at 2500 RPM. Its really pretty amazing now I want to get to modifying this map, but I don't know how to do that. I attached the files to for everyone to examine to see if it looks correct? Also if it checks out where could I start looking to make improvements?
You've got some FBKC in the first log when you stabbed the throttle; this sometimes happens, and didn't happen in the second log, so I wouldn't worry about it too much just yet. Both logs show some FLKC in them.Originally Posted by SubaruWRC
Remove AF Learning, Dynamic Adv (keep DAM), and the two MAF columns, so we'll have a bit better resolution. If you can upload the logs as CSV files (native file extension) to Google Docs, it makes it a little easier to read/manipulate a bit. Just make sure to make them public, so we can read them.
2005 WRX STi (Mods | Virtual Dyno)
Resident Tuner @ WTF Tuning, LLC
"Never trust anything that bleeds for a week and lives ..."
UNYSOC
FBKC is feedback knock? And what does this mean? And what is FLKC? Fine Knock Learning? What does this mean? And what do you mean better resolution? just on the actual document so it is easier to see? Also is the boost supposed to spike like that? it hits 14.9 and I think the boost target is 14.7 which i think is okay because I'm sure it's not that accurate but it drops to 12.5 right after? Is this supposed to happen? Also does it make sense that the wastegate duty only hits 50%?
I've used both. I greatly prefer RomRaider over ATR.
Zax' Shaggin' Wagon Build Thread Now tuned for 99% pure Unicorn Jizz!
Zach | Moderator -- Mid-Atlantic States, Tech & Modifying & General Repairs
The REAL 'WTF Tuning?!' Progenitor
Rollin' with the Bugeye Mafia #302 | N.E.R.D. Subject Zero | Blobeye Synd. #Tree-Fiddy
Facebook me here
Mods <---- drain savings account here
Originally Posted by Mikie13
Bookmarks