Cobbs AP economy map?????

[xsnapshot]

Originally Posted by 2:43AM

...and providing solid MPG numbers was my bread to the table. Excuse me for offending anyone.

Thank you. The rest of us do appreciate hard data.

[all-motor_turbo]

Originally Posted by 2:43AM

Wow. This forum sure has it's share of a$$holes.

EDIT: I'm not going to waste my time.

...and providing solid MPG numbers was my bread to the table. Excuse me for offending anyone.

good. and i am glad you are a credible source. driving up and down mountains, and since we all know your driving style it presents very good results.

in either case we have all come to realize that cobb's product goes untested. in either case, if you want increase fuel economy change the following: the weight of your foot, your tune(take it to the tuner and stop wasting dollars and cents), or just rip the turbo off all together and retune anyway, or start losing significant amounts of body fat(referring to your car or maybe even you)

[xsnapshot]

to all-motor turbo:

How does cobb's product go untested? I could do a simple search of Nasioc and clubWRX and yeild many threads with people presenting data on the performance of cobb's economy map.

also if you want anyone to take you seriously i would consider revising your sig line:

"05 Subaru STI STOCK 279whp 13.52@113 "

No one is gonna believe that. I'll let you figure out why...

[all-motor_turbo]

Originally Posted by xsnapshot

to all-motor turbo:

How does cobb's product go untested? I could do a simple search of Nasioc and clubWRX and yeild many threads with people presenting data on the performance of cobb's economy map.

also if you want anyone to take you seriously i would consider revising your sig line:

"05 Subaru STI STOCK 279whp 13.52@113 "

No one is gonna believe that. I'll let you figure out why...

well ill let you look more closey at my sig and you tell me why no one will believe that. how about that? you act like you know more about cars then i do lol.

[Donkey]

Originally Posted by all-motor_turbo

but if you need some kind of evidence then here it is. cutting boost does nothing for fuel usage because now all that is happening is less air coming in same amount of fuel as before when there was boost. they advanced the timing because when you actually apply boost you need to retard the timing in order to prevent detonation. if you dont advance the timing when you take it back off then the motor will dog

What the hell do you think the ECU does?You realy have no idea how modern ECU's work do you?

Originally Posted by all-motor_turbo

oh and by the way for anyone who wonders i am aem ems standalone with a/f and boost control from the unit. thats the RIGHT way to tune your car.

You sir,are a frigg'n idiot.You obviously have no idea about tuning a factory ECU or MAF based fueling.Like the other have said,you absolutely CAN JUST REDUCE THE BOOST.The ECU will just compare the calculated load against it's current rpm to give the right fuel(in Openloop) and timing.Closedloop fueling could care less as it uses O2 sensor feedback.Before shooting your mouth of you might want to actually research alitte.Thats funny,my stock ECU does A/F and boost control as well as your stand alone.You obviosly just have no clue what so ever.........

[Donkey]

Originally Posted by all-motor_turbo

well ill let you look more closey at my sig and you tell me why no one will believe that. how about that? you act like you know more about cars then i do lol.

You stupid monkey..who cares what your signature says.All that matters is all the incorrect info you keep posting.Couple books for ya to read:


Amazon.ca: How to Tune and Modify Engine Management Systems: Jeff Hartman: Books

Engine Management: Advanced Tuning: Greg Banish: Amazon.ca: Books

It's very obvious you don't know a whole lot about modern ECU tuning...........

[xsnapshot]

Originally Posted by all-motor_turbo

well ill let you look more closey at my sig and you tell me why no one will believe that. how about that? you act like you know more about cars then i do lol.

Well first off...you must have just added the stuff in parenthesis.

second,....I still stand by my statement. There's no way your trapping 113mph with JUST a retune. Sorry that's utter BS. The WORLD RECORD stock turbo sti* traps 113mph with thousands in mods.

" 1. DownSTi...............06 STI....11.78@113.18.....Sacremento Raceway.................100 octane "

*as of the date of the posting of that list anyway

And why yes, you've obviously proven in your last couple of posts that you "know" more about cars than me. So congrats.

[all-motor_turbo]

Originally Posted by Donkey

You stupid monkey..who cares what your signature says.All that matters is all the incorrect info you keep posting.Couple books for ya to read:


Amazon.ca: How to Tune and Modify Engine Management Systems: Jeff Hartman: Books

Engine Management: Advanced Tuning: Greg Banish: Amazon.ca: Books

It's very obvious you don't know a whole lot about modern ECU tuning...........

2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi 1/4 mile Drag Racing timeslip specs 0-60 - DragTimes.com

yea ur right

[Donkey]

Originally Posted by all-motor_turbo

2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi 1/4 mile Drag Racing timeslip specs 0-60 - DragTimes.com

yea ur right

I am right.Your earlier posts prove it......

[xsnapshot]

Originally Posted by all-motor_turbo

2005 Subaru Impreza WRX STi 1/4 mile Drag Racing timeslip specs 0-60 - DragTimes.com

yea ur right

Here's a link to a blender---->Blendtec - Total Blender (Black) - Tabletop Blender

its about as relevant as your link is without any other information, and you can make tasty fruit smoothies...

[all-motor_turbo]

Originally Posted by xsnapshot

Here's a link to a blender---->Blendtec - Total Blender (Black) - Tabletop Blender

its about as relevant as your link is without any other information, and you can make tasty fruit smoothies...

thanks my tune is good enough for the winter. ill just keep my teg for the track and my sti as my winter beater

[2:43AM]

It's threads like these that make searching for stuff friggin' worthless. A completely good and valid thread ruined by useless garbage. Shame on all of us!