That's the problem with dyno charts; they are all different due to temperature, operator inputs, and dyno type.
In this case the dyno is a Dyno Dynamics, or a "heart breaker". They always read low. 210-220whp is decent for a pull on a DD. On a DynoJet, most people get 240-260whp with their STi's (with 260whp being exceptional.)
Dyno's should only be used to measure increases (or decreases) after modifications. They shouldn't be used for comparing to other people's dyno numbers - at least not unless it is the same machine, location, temperature, etc.
think of it this way, would u rather have lower, uncorrected numbers or inflated, higher (corrected for certain variables) numbers? Most aftermarket companies use the latter for better hp numbers for obvious reasons.
I think you need to start a new thread, or post in a newer one.. rather than digging up something from nine years ago from members who are no longer active on the site.
I gapped a 96 WRX STI in my stock srt4 so I'd guess 220whp is correct
In this case the dyno is a Dyno Dynamics, or a "heart breaker". They always read low. 210-220whp is decent for a pull on a DD. On a DynoJet, most people get 240-260whp with their STi's (with 260whp being exceptional.)
Dyno's should only be used to measure increases (or decreases) after modifications. They shouldn't be used for comparing to other people's dyno numbers - at least not unless it is the same machine, location, temperature, etc.
[/QUOTE]
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Subaru WRX Forum
3.2M posts
152.7K members
Since 2001
We invite you to join our Subaru Impreza WRX and STi community to discuss engine mods, builds, detailing, and more.