Gutted up-pipe performance proof
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

This is a discussion on Gutted up-pipe performance proof within the Motorsports Talk forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; I remember seeing someone post a thread about the difference between the stock gutted up-pipe, and an aftermarket straight up-pipe, ...

  1. #1
    Registered User s0n1c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Suburban DC
    Posts
    30

    Gutted up-pipe performance proof

    I remember seeing someone post a thread about the difference between the stock gutted up-pipe, and an aftermarket straight up-pipe, and they hit the dyno. They had other mods, but the gutted up-pipe proved to be identical to the aftermarket pipe.

    Well, I went to the 1/4 mile. I have a 2005 WRX. I have done only one mod to my WRX. A gutted up-pipe. I bought a used stock gutted up-pipe from someone for $15 on ebay (best $15 I have ever spent).

    I took my car to the track in November and in 40 degree weather, I ran 14.607 bone stock.

    I got the uppipe in January, and installed it one day with a friend.
    I went to opening day yesterday at MIR, and in 50 degree weather, I ran 14.355. Same launching techniques.

    I didn't know if anyone else had made a notice of the difference in the up-pipe like this, but for those who had questions about the difference it makes, here's your proof. It's worth it, and it's worth the bloody knuckles and cuts that you'll get from installing it.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Would Never, Ever Say Something Bad About an Admin's Mom SonicWagon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Santa Cruz New Mexico
    Posts
    5,742
    Quote Originally Posted by s0n1c View Post
    and it's worth the bloody knuckles and cuts that you'll get from installing it.
    nice
    "It is at our most challenging times that we must cheat our very hardest" - Eric Theodore Cartman
    Quote Originally Posted by Weasel 555 View Post
    so whose up for been banned?
    Quote Originally Posted by RayfieldsWRX View Post
    I is teh b1ggest douche evarrrr!~

  4. #3
    Registered User efmd3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    9,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Bounce View Post
    interesting. there are a lot of unmeasured differences that could have been there. track conditions, (clearly) temps were different, relative humidity (water density in the air) and so forth.

    some dyno numbers using the same dyno and operator on days with the same conditions would probably result in numbers that are closer to objective.

    the main deal is that you're happy with the seat of the pants dyno differences and driver confidence can place a roll in track performance, too.
    +1 you didn't shave 3/10's with JUST a gutted cat.

  5. #4
    Registered User s0n1c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Suburban DC
    Posts
    30
    You're probably right, but I was taking into consideration the other differences too. The only difference that could have been factored in was seat time. I bought the car in September and the first time at the track was late October (best pass the first night was 14.8), and then again in November when I got 14.6.

    It seemed real un-likely to me that I could shave that much on such a simple part, but after comparing my driving tactics now to what I was doing in November, nothing else there really has changed. It was warmer yesterday than it was back in November when i ran 14.6. It wasn't humid either day, the 14.6 was run at night time and both were at the same track (same lane)....I expected to gain about a tenth of a second from the upgrade, so I when I saw I gained 1/4 of a second I was rather surprised. Either way, I'm still happy with my $15 part.

    And for the record, there's no way I'm going to put the stock pipe back on and run it again just for numbers... :P

  6. #5
    Registered User efmd3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    9,158
    lol, its definitely an upgrade, and a huge reliability mod.

  7. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brighton MA
    Posts
    78
    any difference in the trap speeds?

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself. We strongly suggest that you stay away from using aol, yahoo, msn, and hotmail accounts. Sometimes the mail server blocks the emails from our server. As a result you will not receive any notifications including the confirmation email.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •