15,000 Layer Photoshop File

**dsel** · 04-13-2006 03:30 PM

Originally Posted by wrx wagone

Someone should tell him that they make cameras in digital now. You can just like fly out to Chicago and *click* picture. No 15,000 layers needed.

tell that to all the artists in the world. No need to paint anything...we gots cameras now.

Photorealists who do the same thing with oil paint also take about a year to do the same basic thing, but computer free.

**wrx wagone** · 04-13-2006 04:16 PM

Originally Posted by dsel

tell that to all the artists in the world. No need to paint anything...we gots cameras now.

Photorealists who do the same thing with oil paint also take about a year to do the same basic thing, but computer free.

*click* picture.

**MasiveMunkey** · 04-13-2006 07:59 PM

It doesn't seem that impressive to me. I know it was hard to do, but you don't really feel that when you look at it. Maybe I have to see the full version.

**wrx wagone** · 04-13-2006 08:08 PM

Originally Posted by MasiveMunkey

It doesn't seem that impressive to me. I know it was hard to do, but you don't really feel that when you look at it. Maybe I have to see the full version.

I was think the same thing. I guess it is because I don't understand the medium too well.

As soon as I realized, that dude had to use his mind to create the art and then transfer that to his medium (photoshop) just like a painter uses paint. Wow.

**felo3769** · 04-13-2006 08:25 PM

I showed it to my friend and he wasnt impressed either. He sent me these renderings.

http://www.cgnetworks.com/gallerycri...1100798276.jpg
http://www.cgnetworks.com/gallerycri...1104371430.jpg
http://features.cgsociety.org/galler...1123626292.jpg

this is the site.

http://forums.cgsociety.org/forumdis...5&daysprune=-1

**VeganWRX** · 04-14-2006 11:56 AM

Thats sweet! I get off of that el stop every day for work. I will now look at it in a whole new light. Thanks for the link.

**Hybrid-X** · 04-14-2006 12:09 PM

Wow.

**c00lbeans** · 04-16-2006 12:42 PM

wow what a complete waist of time. i could have done that in 1 second with my camera

**Racenut** · 04-16-2006 01:14 PM

I think what makes it so amazing is when you look at the zoomed in sections of it. Like the detail on the train, or the rust on the fence. Those are all details that from the full picture, you can't even see. But in a digital format, being able to zoom in to that level of detail couldn't be done with a digital camera image.

**cyrilgrey** · 04-16-2006 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by Racenut3.0

I think what makes it so amazing is when you look at the zoomed in sections of it. Like the detail on the train, or the rust on the fence. Those are all details that from the full picture, you can't even see. But in a digital format, being able to zoom in to that level of detail couldn't be done with a digital camera image.

Yes it can, but I don't see how that changes anything. You can't compare this to a photograph. It isn't.

**Death To Ricers** · 04-16-2006 05:39 PM

That is amazing. Those of use who photoshop know how to admire it. 15,000.

I can't even imagine doing something of that nature.

**Stumbo** · 04-17-2006 12:54 PM

THats amazing, I would love to see the full size printed image in person. Thats HUGE!!

**Stumbo** · 04-17-2006 01:02 PM

And to all you naysayers....

This isnt a 3d Rendering, this is a high resolution 2d image created from scratch.

And the "i could take a picture like that" is silly.

**WRXTwiztid** · 04-17-2006 03:17 PM

its simply amazing. If i could do that work in illustrator i would be getting paid so freaking much... on your resume its like here is a sample of my work, WOW who wouldn't higher you in the graphic design industry.