JL vs. Boston Accoustic - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

This is a discussion on JL vs. Boston Accoustic within the Interior Mods forums, part of the Tech & Modifying & General Repairs category; I hear good things about Focals too. It all depends.....

  1. #16
    Registered User Th3Franz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,766
    I hear good things about Focals too. It all depends..
    - F r a n z
    Bucky with teh lime powah!

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #17
    Registered User ervv173's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    245

    jl 6.5's

    i have jl xr 6.5's in front and rear and im happy with them. they will definitely need to be amplified as will the bostons, and the xr's wont fit the stock panel. i love their speakers and their subs...but unlike most people, im not too impressed with their amps.

  4. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    College Station
    Posts
    88

    Re: jl 6.5's

    Originally posted by ervv173
    but unlike most people, im not too impressed with their amps.
    You dont like JL amps? I'm currious why. The only amp I've had was the JL 500/5 and as far as I know it was awesome...
    "We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas"

    2000 Camaro SS

  5. #19
    Registered User ervv173's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    245
    i could have just got a weak one, so i wont say that they arent quality. but my 300/4 was toast after a few months of pretty light use with the 4 xr's. even if it had stayed working though, i would still feel that they arent a great value for the price.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •