This is a discussion on 2009 model year Engine failures - the debate within the Engine Modifications forums, part of the Tech & Modifying & General Repairs category; Originally Posted by FlyingMoose Binj - I'm assuming you were running one of Perrin's AP maps? Do you think that ...
10/08 is well within the safe range. I did not see any mention of 10/08.
So when a 2011 engine goes all the 09-11 will be inconclusive then. He is the lone exception. Find me another with a 10/08 build or a hatch with a VIN above 805xxx. I have not seen any in the well over 100+ cases on NASIOC. If you can't come to a conclusion about an early 9/08 cutoff from the multiple threads on NASIOC I will never be able to convince you so I am done. In the 93 page monster thread
There is a post about a hard cutoff as stated by a Subaru rep. I am not going to read all 93 pages to find it but it is there. There will be always be "x" failures reguardless.
The post you are referring to i think is on page 87 post # 2161.Subaru knows about it but won't say **** due to massive costs involved. It seems pretty clear when these failures stopped happening i would'nt call this whole thing inconclusive.
& matches the info below. September is the transition month with August & early Sept builds being 805xxx & late September builds being 807xxx (for hatch). There are also Oct build dates with 807xxx so that indicates it is a late Sept build.
Let me also clarify all this below is related to the 2009 failures on 2009 model year vehicles--not the 2008 stop sale. Someone questioned this being confused with the 2008 stop sale & it was specifically pointed out in post #1322 that this was in reguards to the 2009 model issues not the 2008 stop sale.
The one you found is good but these that follow are the ones I was thinking of:
All these nexts posts are from member Tuningislife; he had an engine blow, had a repacement engine instealled--which then blew--& got SOA to buy his car back & give him a new one--a 9/08 build as the ultimate fix.
Ok. So to clarify with everyone
I got the Tech dept to admit to a problem
They said that there is now counter-cleaning measures put in place by Fuji since Sept 2008. What this means is that there WAS a problem with contamination in the oil. That problem has since been resolved. For all July and August build dates, you are sitting on a ticking timebomb. Sept I was still be wary. BUT WAIT! Didn't I have a second motor put in, that was supposed to correct this problem? The answer is yes, only logic is that my second motor was produced before Sept 08.
What Subaru of America offered to do FOR ME.
They gave me 3 options.
1. Buy my car back
2. Put me into another 2009 exact same specs, made after Sept 08
3. Put a new long block in and reimburse me for my inconvenience.
"They skated around a perticuar date. They stated tech said there was a problem with a certain vin date and that cars made after that time were fine. I asked if this was sept and they said yes."
Two different issues. STI issues were due to ringland failure and also included a stop sale with a specific VIN. This is about the 2009 WRX with rod bearing failures causing engine knock between a certain RPM on a specific set of VINs that is a non stated problem.
...I blew up 2 motors and broke both in properly. SoA NEVER ONCE mentioned the word abuse to me. The dealer on the other hand did...If anyone has seen my posts, you would know I have pried a decent amount of info out of SoA, that they state vehicles made after 09/08 should not be prone to this problem. Even our record keeping here proves that point.
Another member also received similar information. These nexts posts are from member Dusty Whiskers.
...after learning of the new WRX engine issues I queried several dealers about the failures. Most of them had no idea about any sort of engine failures, however one dealer was keen to admit that there had been a problem, and in fact admitted one 09 wrx owner they had sold to had had his car in for an engine replacement. According to the sales rep I spoke with, the engine failures are due to a manufacturing defect that has only affected certain earlier VIN's so far. He wasn't extremely specific about the exact nature of the failures, but did say it had to do with a manufacturing defect that basically resulted in a certain number of engines which had internal contaminants sealed inside the engine inappropriately upon the time of manufacture, which down the road after a couple thousand miles obviously lead to in the failures.
Now I can't say for certain that what he told me was 100% true, however this is the first I have heard anything coming from a dealer that seems to match what people have discovered here so far--failure preeminently in a certain set of VINs, and either resulting in or caused by there being something in the engine that shouldn't have been there in the first place.
I still think I'm going to hold off a little longer in deciding to purchase a new WRX, but hopefully what I've found indicates as some have assumed, that the engine failures are merely the result of a manufacturing defect that has only affected a limited number of VIN's.
He was scant on details regarding the exact VIN numbers affected, though I did not press him on that question. What he said was essentially to the effect that WRX's with the newer build dates should no longer have this problem.
Sure Subaru may never give an official press release, it's common sense as bad publicity will hurt sales even more than rumors of defective engines.
But that won't stopping them of informing mechanics of the defects or affected VIN range, and I'm sure someone with enough problems who asks will likely be informed of this by a mechanic or sales rep who knows about this.
Last edited by Bryce919er; 11-03-2010 at 09:19 PM.
First off, you are assuming that everything after one date is fine because they implemented some sort of fix. Do you know how they implemented it? Did it apply to all engines that were manufactured or was it a subset? To what thresholds did they clean the cranks? Did they only make one change since they found the problem or have they been updating the cleaning specifications? There is a lot unknown here and it is particularly troubling that some engines failed within a few hundred miles and others made it to 25k. We could potentially see a lot more of these higher mileage failures because they didn't have things dialed in perfectly when they first implemented the fix. Also, a lot of the '09s still have low mileage. Case in point: my 08/08 WRX has about 6,900 miles right now. A few things to think about. The point is we don't have any internal knowledge about how they approached the problem so we can't restrict things to binary decision making.
My second point is something that is somewhat of a unifying theme of many of my posts is that you can't take information from these forums and call it fact. Those on the forums are a small subset of the population of Subaru owners so you can't extrapolate from that point. Do they run their cars harder? Maybe. Do they better maintain their car? Possibly. We have no clue what it means aside from the fact it doesn't represent the entire population. Not to say it is worthless information but you should be cautious when using it.
It is your call how to interpret this situation. If you like to put things in convenient "yes" or "no" categories without allowing for a gray area then that is your choice. But do not lead others to believe that your opinion is fact before we have all the necessary information.
i get your points which are good but either way there have been waaay to many failures of the same nature and how many failures of the 10's and up have you heard of with any of the same problems? there are way to many near the same dates to rule it out that subaru is hiding something there. your right about speculating but you can't deny that something was up. ok ill try this another way....can you prove that they are all cooincidences.
I'm assuming this thread was spawned from somewhere else since it just kinda starts mid-discussion?
My 2 cents...Subaru "fixed" that late-summer of 08 build issue on WRXs and it only impacts those few production months. I remember reading about a very specific change to the build materials (going from aluminum to silver or something) that didn't hold up to heat as well. My understanding was that the "fix" in Sept/Oct was to just go back to the original material. So I believe the line-in-the-sand and that this is no longer an issue. Any failures past build dates of Oct 08 have been rare, completely random, and IMO not related.
However, I do not believe the STI ringland failure has ever been addressed. Besides saving a ton of money, that's actually the #1 why I chose an 11 WRX over an STI...I feel that the WRXs have had their issue fixed whereas the STIs haven't.
Steve // 2010 Cadillac CTS-V // 2011 WRX hatchback (SOLD)