You are going to try to drag race people with a V6 Mustang?Dude, get the GT please, dont embarrass yourself.
This is a discussion on 2005 WRX vs. 2005 MUSTANG within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; Originally Posted by racinready300ex Or sell my wrx get a GT through on a supercharger and smoke 98% or the ...
my friend's new mustang took a while to grow on me. At first i was like.. "Wtf is that piece....?"Originally Posted by racinready300ex
but now i look at it, and i kinda like it. i still prefer the '03-'04 mustang look though
i cna't wait to get my rex and own him in a race![]()
Straightaways are for fast cars, corners are for fast drivers...
Originally Posted by EVOVIII
You are going to try to drag race people with a V6 Mustang?Dude, get the GT please, dont embarrass yourself.
Originally Posted by EVOVIII
LOL, the "get the GT please, don't embarass yourself" was ****ign hilarious
Straightaways are for fast cars, corners are for fast drivers...
Originally Posted by EVOVIII
Your stable had me at the '66 and continued to wow me all the way to the WRX. <3!!!Originally Posted by cojo428
Aloha, Richard...
Retired Moderator
TXS Stage 4 UTEC + TMIC + JoeP
12.75 @ 105.67mph - 1.74 60'
I read something recently that the 05 V6 Stang does the 1/4 in 15.1 or somewhere around there. Definetly would get whipped by a WRX, assuming stock for stock and equal drivers/conditions.
Ryan
2003 REDFIRE COBRA
pullied, sprayed, ported
Yeah, but I bet a auto vs auto would be close. It sounds like thouse 5 spd auto are pretty decent.Originally Posted by StngStr
Its a V6 mustang... no matter how much horsepower they put out, it will always find a way to be slow as hell.
My first car was a 94 v6 mustang. It was always such a mystery to me how a 3.8L block made only 140hp and still managed to blow up all the time (3 engines in 1.5 yrs).
Helix UP/TBE, ECUTEK
230whp / 225 wtq
2005 Yamaha R1 Raven Black
a recent car and driver i read had a page on the EXACT car my friend has: an automatic 2005 mustang w/ premium optionsOriginally Posted by StngStr
i don't rember much...
curb weight approx. : 3,450
Horsepower: 210
Torque: 240
0-60: 7.1? or maybe it was 6.1
0-100 19.0 <-- this i am sure of
top speed: 112(governor limited)
awful awful awful stats. the chevy cobalt specs made the mustang look like a piece of sh!t
lesson: don't buy a V6 mustang....
Straightaways are for fast cars, corners are for fast drivers...
Originally Posted by EVOVIII
I test drove a new Mustang GT 5mt today. Those things are quick. I'm fairly confident that my Cobb Stage 2 WRX could take it, but a stock WRX would have no chance regardless of circumstances. I know this is a little off topic, but I was just very impressed with the 05 Mustang GT, and I hate Mustangs.
Try not, do or do not. There is no try. - Yoda
Mods
Originally Posted by Bertbert2oo6
The lesson should be if you want a performace car buy the GT, that's why they make it. The V6 is for those who want a mustang but don't need the v8 power. So to sum it up V6's are for chicks.![]()
He speaks the trufOriginally Posted by EVOVIII
V6 F-bodies and Mustangs are chick cars, and they have no performance potential whatsoever. I remember some fool with a 3.8L Firebird on LS1tech.com about a year back, talking about how he was running high 11s. He was boosting the **** out of his motor with a blower and spraying a 50-shot on top of it to hit those times..![]()
gh3y
2002 WRX Sedan
Aspen White 5MT... bone stock
Bookmarks