acura rsx type s WTF? - Page 2
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

This is a discussion on acura rsx type s WTF? within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; Originally posted by AwdTurboWrx type s always puts on a good fight off a roll...stock on stock i'm starting to ...

  1. #16
    Registered User DTR rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Chi-town, IL
    Originally posted by AwdTurboWrx
    type s always puts on a good fight off a roll...stock on stock i'm starting to think type s would probably keep up or win
    for the most part, you are correct.

    went out racing last weekend and a friend with an rsx-s with exhaust and intake pulled a about 2 cars on a stock wrx from 45-110

    they didnt bother from a dig because the outcome would have been obvious though. i wanted to run against the rex but we were fearful of the cops.

    i have been waiting to race a stock rex from a roll for over 6 months now!
    Just call me Clark Kent
    Offical Body Guard for the Bugeye Mafia.

  2. Remove Advertisements

  3. #17
    Registered User WRX-Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    You have a VF30 and no engine management is this correct?
    <<My car
    COBB Stage II --- 8.52 @ 81mph in the 1/8 mile

  4. #18
    Registered User high on 02C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Bay Area, CA
    yeah but there are alotta cars out there that have the power to pull on a wrx from a roll. From a launch its almost no fun getting 5 car lenghts out the gate - but from a roll its a totally different story
    03 Wagon WRB

    My Mods/Pics

  5. Remove Advertisements

  6. #19
    Registered User fastwrx135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    gurnee, IL
    Its the fact that you have a VF30 with no management. Once you get the fuel mods and utec in, you should pull away with ease from that car. This has been said many times, but the WRX doesn't have great top end and you guys raced from a roll right? The RSX is reliant on its top end. Thats honda/acura's trademark, just as the AWD launch is for the WRX. So all in all, i think the raced turned out exactly how it was suppose to.
    '03 PSM WRX Stg 4 <---SOLD
    '04 G35 coupe<-----MY NEW CAR

  7. #20
    Registered User MidnightFLAT4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Dayton Ohio, Chicago IL
    hmm, vf30 with no EM, sounds dumb
    03 MBP WRX Sedan
    STi RA gearset October 4th,STi Trans Mount
    Cobb AccessECU STG II 16.4psi. Bosal DP, Catless OEM UP, 205/55 ZR16 Futura Ultra Z's.

  8. #21
    Registered User 13secwrx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    actually its not dumb at all. I know many people who run vf30's and 22's w/no em at all at lower boosts. Sti's ran em so why cant we? They run fine. Just my .02 from my experiences. People told me not to run my stock intercooler w/ a vf 22 and I did for over a year w/ no issues.
    L.I.S.C #00 (Treasurer)
    02 Wrx...465whp and 472 whtq. 100 Octane
    387whp and 371 whtq. 93 Octane

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself. We strongly suggest that you stay away from using aol, yahoo, msn, and hotmail accounts. Sometimes the mail server blocks the emails from our server. As a result you will not receive any notifications including the confirmation email.

Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts