Which would you rather have? - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

This is a discussion on Which would you rather have? within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; last time I check was k plus labor....

  1. #16
    Registered User slin02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Carol Stream, IL
    Posts
    555
    last time I check was $8k plus labor.
    my car is slow,,,,,, very slow.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    988
    I'm gonna have to say the STI. I'm still pissed at mitsubishi for my old car and will hold a grudge for the rest of my life. Plus I don't trust all the "electronic this and electronic that". I like the simple Subaru approach. Plus, Mitsubishi doesn't have that (as Tiff Needle puts it) "famous Subaru power buldge!"

  4. #18
    Registered User Quantum-Racing.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    387
    I hate to say it, but since I've owned and modded both an EJ20 engine and two 4G63's (Lancer motor), I would have to say the the Mitsu motor is faster. You can run more boost, etc. Don't flame me, I am just stating my opinion. The EJ20 sounds better, true. I would pick an STi over a Lancer, but a 4G63 over and EJ20.
    www.Quantum-Racing.com
    Home of the Dynapack AWD Dyno
    Sales Email, Tech Email
    937.642.5400

  5. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    87
    I would say STI, but if I could, I think I would take the WRX and the difference in price and add a lot of goodies to the WRX. Larger turbo, suspension upgrade, etc... But I wouldn't mind the six-speed

    Adam

    02 Sedan
    Some stuff on it

  6. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    7
    EVO without a doubt. For anyone who has ever been to Japan and seen the two cars up close, there is no comparison...
    1997 Arctic Silver M3/2
    UUC Tranny Mounts, UUC Clutch Bushings, Motorsport X-Brace, Alpine CDA 7894, JBL BP600.1, JL 12W3 V2

  7. #21
    Registered User TurboWRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Morgantown, WV (WVU)
    Posts
    837
    Originally posted by tsarte
    Sport Compact Car did a review of them and the VII came out faster and more precise due to their active diffs but they had more fun with the STi
    the EVO kicked the crap out of their Project WRX (US version)...not an STi. so this was really an unfair matchup since the EVO is designed to compete with the STi, not a US WRX. they did a review on the STi later in the magazine
    Originally posted by AbACUZ
    im new in here, I am AbACUZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Originally posted by AbACUZ
    No where, is my style diferent, yes, I am AbACUZ.

  8. #22
    Registered User PlatinumWRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    6,581
    Originally posted by cravnpup
    EVO without a doubt. For anyone who has ever been to Japan and seen the two cars up close, there is no comparison...
    The question was between the US version of the STi or US version of the Evo. JDM is whole different ball game.

    -Jim

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •