Wrx Vs 350z - Page 7
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 124

This is a discussion on Wrx Vs 350z within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; Originally posted by TunaWrap first of all i was definitely talking about the type R. all the 350z stats i've ...

  1. #91
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    108
    Originally posted by TunaWrap
    first of all i was definitely talking about the type R.

    all the 350z stats i've found say its at best a 13.9 second car. Why does it always seem outlandish when a wrx breaks into the 13's stock but when you come and say your 350z pulled 60ft times that put to shame an awd launch, then we have to say "oh yeah every car is better than the wrx".
    I wasn't talking TO or ABOUT you....I was talking about whodeani's post.....which I quoted.

    Why don't you respond to my post ABOUT YOU....instead of the ones about other people? READ AND REPLY TO POST NUMBER 8 ON PAGE 3

    Do you lack basic comprehension skills????

    nice job mag racing...we know that whatever magazines run is the best you can possibly extract from a vehicle.

    About my 60' times putting AWD to shame...are you on CRACK???? I've personally seen WRX's pull 1.7x 60' times...I wouldn't exactly call a 2.0 short time stellar.
    03 350Z - intake, test pipes
    Best STOCK E.T. 13.68@102.77mph 2.09 60'
    Best mods E.T. 13.38@103.60mph 1.90 60'

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #92
    Registered User AwdTurboWrx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sun Valley,CA
    Posts
    5,793
    Originally posted by whodeani
    AwdTurboWrx-

    My mods at the time I ran those times were: HKS SSQ BOV, CMB Carbo Dynamic Aribox, ECS N75 race valve, 3" Down Pipe, test tube (no cat) 100 octance race program APR, Samco Turbo Inlet pipe, no interrior or spare tire, have stock CB exhust, and street tires.

    Now I have added Neu speed pullies and MBC...

    shooting for 13.8's this year.

    awesome ...car looks sweet 2 from what i can see in your avatar
    The Ghosts of Zooph and Sarcasmo Will haunt CLUBWRX forever!!!

  4. #93
    Registered User AwdTurboWrx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sun Valley,CA
    Posts
    5,793
    Originally posted by TunaWrap
    first of all i was definitely talking about the type R.

    all the 350z stats i've found say its at best a 13.9 second car. Why does it always seem outlandish when a wrx breaks into the 13's stock but when you come and say your 350z pulled 60ft times that put to shame an awd launch, then we have to say "oh yeah every car is better than the wrx".
    dude i'll defend briguymax because his not an idiot like yourself...first of all guy respects wrx or he woudlnt be on this forum..his said it before..lets not turn clubwrx into some elitist form like the bmw/supra/vw forums..2nd of all..tunawrap are you bllind or retarded?? best you've seen is 13.9??? i showed a damn story with them breaking 13.77 with a stock z @ 100mph..if you had the mental capacity to read the rest of that story would also see that the article mentions that z just seems to get quicker with more miles on it(or maybe testers learning how to drive the car finally)...dont throw out stupid numbers with no proof
    The Ghosts of Zooph and Sarcasmo Will haunt CLUBWRX forever!!!

  5. #94
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Hickory, NC
    Posts
    960
    I used to be a member of the bmw forums. Wow, what a bunch of **** heads.
    Mods

    Armed with a rotated Precision 6265 turbo at 35psi and a built 2.5 liter.

  6. #95
    Registered User AwdTurboWrx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sun Valley,CA
    Posts
    5,793
    Originally posted by ilivas
    I used to be a member of the bmw forums. Wow, what a bunch of **** heads.
    try the surpa forums..they disown you if you say anything negative about supra
    The Ghosts of Zooph and Sarcasmo Will haunt CLUBWRX forever!!!

  7. #96
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Hickory, NC
    Posts
    960
    same with the mustang and camaro forums.
    Mods

    Armed with a rotated Precision 6265 turbo at 35psi and a built 2.5 liter.

  8. #97
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    479
    Originally posted by DTR maxima


    i love these types of threads......

    idiots like tunawrap can provide entertainment for days on end

  9. #98
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    479
    Originally posted by AwdTurboWrx
    dude i'll defend briguymax because his not an idiot like yourself...

  10. #99
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    479
    Originally posted by BriGuyMax
    um....you are nearly a full second off with your 1/4 mile time estimates for 350Z's....

    I ran 13.6 stock and guys with basic bolt-ons are low 13s...
    ...and your calling him the idiot...i doubt a 350z is a low 13 second car with "bolt ons"...lemme geuss an ice man intake and an obx exhaust will put that thing at 400whp?

  11. #100
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    108
    Originally posted by burrito007
    ...and your calling him the idiot...i doubt a 350z is a low 13 second car with "bolt ons"...lemme geuss an ice man intake and an obx exhaust will put that thing at 400whp?
    Who are you even talking about??????

    You don't have to be a sarcastic ****....it just makes you look dumb.

    Let's see...I have 243rwhp stock...and I ran 13.6...I'd only have to knock off 3-4 tenths to be considered a "low 13 second car". Hell I could do that with just a set of slicks without any added hp at all.

    bolt-on Zs put down between 265-280rwhp (some even higher)...that's between a 20 and 40rwhp GAIN. I took 3 tenths off and added 2mph to my old maxima with just one 15whp exhaust mod. How exactly wouldn't you consider a 280rwhp 3100lb car a low 13 second car? Furthermore....guys HAVE run low 13s with bolt-ons...so I'm no just speculating.

    The 400whp Z's are low 12s to high 11s cars depending on traction.
    03 350Z - intake, test pipes
    Best STOCK E.T. 13.68@102.77mph 2.09 60'
    Best mods E.T. 13.38@103.60mph 1.90 60'

  12. #101
    Registered User TunaWrap's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    54
    Originally posted by BriGuyMax
    Who are you even talking about??????

    You don't have to be a sarcastic ****....it just makes you look dumb.

    Let's see...I have 243rwhp stock...and I ran 13.6...I'd only have to knock off 3-4 tenths to be considered a "low 13 second car". Hell I could do that with just a set of slicks without any added hp at all.

    bolt-on Zs put down between 265-280rwhp (some even higher)...that's between a 20 and 40rwhp GAIN. I took 3 tenths off and added 2mph to my old maxima with just one 15whp exhaust mod. How exactly wouldn't you consider a 280rwhp 3100lb car a low 13 second car? Furthermore....guys HAVE run low 13s with bolt-ons...so I'm no just speculating.

    The 400whp Z's are low 12s to high 11s cars depending on traction.
    ...you resort to calling people "****" because they dont believe that for some reason you are so special to run a 13.6 WHEN THE ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD RUNS A 14.25 WITH THAT CAR....u must be either an exceptional driver or just a kid who makes false claims...i really wanna see this 13.6 slip...i geuss nissan was joking when they said their car was a 14.2 1/4 mile...i geuss that was the fake time..

  13. #102
    Registered User wrxinfx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    house
    Posts
    1,303
    close this thread already. Its not wrx vs. 350 anymore. I think I need an advil.

  14. #103
    Registered User DTR rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chi-town, IL
    Posts
    27,076
    Originally posted by burrito007
    ...and your calling him the idiot...i doubt a 350z is a low 13 second car with "bolt ons"...lemme geuss an ice man intake and an obx exhaust will put that thing at 400whp?
    although briguys times are a little low, that just do to the fact that he is a rather exceptional driver. but there are so many people still in the high 13's range. and most people consider low 13's to be 13.3 or lower... many Z's are running "low 13's" with basic bolt ons.

    the wrx is no different... the majority of people here will run a 14.3-14.6 with a stock rex. but every now and again you get really good drivers that run a 14.0-14.2
    its all relative to ability.
    Just call me Clark Kent
    ---------------------------------------
    Offical Body Guard for the Bugeye Mafia.

  15. #104
    Registered User TunaWrap's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    54
    Originally posted by DTR maxima
    although briguys times are a little low, that just do to the fact that he is a rather exceptional driver. but there are so many people still in the high 13's range. and most people consider low 13's to be 13.3 or lower... many Z's are running "low 13's" with basic bolt ons.

    the wrx is no different... the majority of people here will run a 14.3-14.6 with a stock rex. but every now and again you get really good drivers that run a 14.0-14.2
    its all relative to ability.
    so the professional driver in the 350z who recorded a 14.30 sucked at driving?

  16. #105
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    479
    sometimes professional driver doesn't always mean professional driver. maybe he was just a driver by profession like a taxicab driver. i'd like to see a taxicab driver or a pizzaboy (both professional drivers) make a good time like 14.3.

    you don't know cooking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •