I thought you would have realized that this guy was a fuktard and was not representative of the RSX crowd, but apparently you felt the need to bash us all. Thanks for your maturity!Originally posted by keystah
That is pretty funny. 2003 WRX + mods and he wanted to kick his ass cause the car is ugly? Hey, at least my car has some sort of unique style, its not a reskinned FWD civic 'aiight?
Yeah, its called no torque. Ever. But especially not under 5500 rpm. TT supra would own him unless it wasn't racing.
Oh yea, and its "i-vtec," not "vtec." There is a difference, not that you careSince I can already take a shot at your response, of course the 2.0 litre in the WRX is more potent than the 2.0 litre in the RSX-S. No doubt about it, WRX = faster and more potential. Whomever argues that is stupid.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
Since I can already take a shot at your response, of course the 2.0 litre in the WRX is more potent than the 2.0 litre in the RSX-S. No doubt about it, WRX = faster and more potential. Whomever argues that is stupid.


Bookmarks