EVO bad mouths WRX
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

This is a discussion on EVO bad mouths WRX within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; I was reading a post at Evolutionm.net and it suprised me. The post was Am I the pimp of this ...

  1. #1
    Registered User SGOSWRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,059

    EVO bad mouths WRX

    I was reading a post at Evolutionm.net and it suprised me.
    The post was
    Am I the pimp of this forum.

    We all know a stock WRX is not as fast as a stock EVO. The EVO makes more HP and much more Torque. This guy beat a WRX in a 1/4 mile race. The WRX ran 14.6 and he said "who ever said a WRX could touch an EVO was smoking crack" . I didn't know people were saying a stock WRX could beat an EVO?
    Thats not what bothered me. What bothered me was when he said in a later post that
    "WRX's should be racing Civics"

    This guy definately needs a reality check. The WRX has everything in common with the EVO and nothing in common with a Civic. I just hope he keeps racing stock $24,000, 227hp WRX's so his ego can remain intact.

    Link

    http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthr...5&pagenumber=2
    Last edited by SGOSWRX; 04-06-2003 at 06:15 AM.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    44
    Don't worry about him too much, he is an idiot. Wait til the STi comes out, that'll shut EVO drivers' mouths for....forever.
    02 Aspen White WRX Sportwagon

  4. #3
    Registered User silverscooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cary, NC
    Posts
    976
    Yeah, let them have their couple of months in the sun. I have not been too impressed with the times I've seen out of some people in that car. However, that car is still pretty badass.
    2002 WRX 352whp & 341ft-lbs *SOLD*
    12.5@109
    2004 SRT4 449whp & 457ft-lbs
    11.6@125

  5. #4
    Moderator WilliamG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,215
    I Support ClubWRX
    I love how at the end he says 'STi watch yourself!'

    Haha! Ignorant fool!

    Anyway, anyone with a brain knows the EVO VIII is faster than a WRX, and handles somewhat better in stock vs stock trim. This guy is an ass.
    2010 SSM STI

  6. #5
    Registered User slimasian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    276
    Early speculation of the US-spec STi:

    300 hp/ 300 lb/ft. torque (everyone knows this )
    0-60 in 4.4 seconds (WHOA...can anyone say M3 hunter??)
    1/4 mile in the mid to low 13's trapping at 101-103 mph

    Oh yeah, not to mention it comes stock with DCCD and yes AVC, aka "Vtec" in Honda terms or "VVTi" in Toyota terms.

    Quite honestly, not only will the STi outright go medieval on the Evo...but the topend of that thing is gonna be killer!! "STi watch out". And who was smoking crack again? lol

    -slim
    2003 Subaru Impreza WRX (AP Stage 2)
    Midnight Black, weathered and beaten thanks to the wonderful citizens of Philadelphia, PA

    2005 Honda S2000
    Silverstone Metallic Exterior, Red/Black Interior, a shifter made in heaven

  7. #6
    Registered User CustomS10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Western Mass
    Posts
    7,959
    ok i just read that whole thread and i must say, sano or whatever his name is needs to get a clue. also the guy that says he likes to banzai drop his clutch will be in for service real fast. it's ok let them talk now. eventhough we didn't talk saying we can ruin a lancer because that would be obvious. just shows a maturity level.
    -Ben-
    Spark it or Park it!

  8. #7
    Registered User 2003WRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    583
    Ahhh, who cares what that guy thinks. The EVO has more HP/Torque stock for stock. If it wasnt faster, it'd be a giant waste of $. I suppose the SRT-4 should be racing Civics too. The new Car & Driver that showed up yesterday ran that thing 0-60 in 5.4 and 14.1 in the 1/4...
    2003 WRX Sedan
    2004 Nissan Xterra SE 4x4

  9. #8
    Registered User SGOSWRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,059
    Another thing I think is funny is he forgot to look at his own time slips. He was bad mouthing a WRX because it only ran 14.6, yet

    he only ran 14.5, 14.3, and 14.3 before his two runs in the 13s.



    I guess he should also be racing Civics?

  10. #9
    Registered User B-Rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    59

    Closet Case?

    Sano Quotes:

    ********************

    "My weight 150 pounds (ripped though)"

    "(I suck donkey balls)"

    "So I agreed to the cocky little man's challenge"

    "it still halls balls"

    "I was very happy..."

    "why don't you go blow off some steam instead of picking on 150 pounds of ass ..."

    "I will line up with you anyday..."

    *********************

    Does anyone see a pattern here? Sano! Quit living a lie! Come on out, be true to yourself....
    (not that there is anything wrong with that...)


  11. #10
    Registered User GREDDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    319
    I love the part about the 97 BMW 328 as fast as a WRX. That was a good laugh! Last I remembered, 97 M3's were losing to my stock WRX. What a joke!

  12. #11
    Registered User WRXin''s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    8,634
    That guy is by no means a car person. I have respect for all cars and see the pros and cons of all of them. There's no need to be talking smack about other cars just because you beat them.

    If he truly was a car guy, he would have posted his victory without condescending the Rex. Poor fool...he won't know what him when he races an STi or a stage 4 WRX for that matter.
    Fahd

    Floats like a butterfly and stings like when I pee!

  13. #12
    Registered User GREDDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    319
    The STI will "KILL" an evo! No doubt about that. The sti has more power and torque with less weight compared to the EVO's 3250lb. These guys are dumb ass*s!

  14. #13
    Registered User chobits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    606
    Fu*k ........ i tried to post something on the evo forums, and it said, "server is busy, try again later."
    Wtf?
    i'm really pissed off now

  15. #14
    Registered User AmSFighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    219
    I frequent evolutionm.net to get some laughs. It's really hard to take some of the folks over there seriously. Some of the guys are cool and knowledgable while the others are typical ricers and/or clueless. They're just picking on the wrx right now because they know once the STi comes out, it'll OWN the evo.
    2006 Porsche Cayman S

  16. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    315
    just another ignorant car "enthusiast"
    Kory "I love Rexes and STis"

    - 2006 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6
    - 2001 Acura CL Type S
    - 1998 Prelude S
    - 1997 Eclipse GSX
    - 1996 Eclipse GS

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •