2002 Cobb Stage I WRX vs 2002 SS Camaro - Page 4

View Poll Results: Who will win.

Voters
60. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2002 Cobb Stage I 5 speed WRX

    11 18.33%
  • 2002 SLP SS 6 speed Camaro

    49 81.67%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 50 of 50

This is a discussion on 2002 Cobb Stage I WRX vs 2002 SS Camaro within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; Originally Posted by Trainrex Love the car in your avatar. What mods? Sorry, off topic....

  1. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainrex View Post
    Love the car in your avatar. What mods?

    Sorry, off topic.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #47
    Registered User Dan00Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    759
    Quote Originally Posted by Flat 4 View Post
    I've never seen one of these "magical" LS1 Camaros run faster than a 13.60 in bone stock trim at the track either, yet I keep hearing about these "common" 13.10s-13.20s for LS1 F-Bodies....
    If conditions are close to ideal, then it's possible. My 98 Formula once squeaked out a 13.32 at 104.5 mph (automatic trans). Typically, though it ran mid to high 13's when completely stock before I started modding it. I'd say it's "common" for the BEST ET for someone's LS1 F-body to be low 13's, but it may not "commonly" do it. People too often assume that a vehicle's best time is infinitely repeatable, when in all reality it may only do that once out of 50 times... Food for thought.


    2007 VW GTI 6 spd. No times yet
    2000 Firehawk convertible 6spd- 12.52 @ 114.7 mph. 2.09 60'

    Sold: 2004 Mini Cooper S. 14.95 @ 93.8 mph.
    Sold: 2004 GTO 6 spd. 13.4 @ 104.5 mph
    Sold: 2002 WRX 5spd. 13.39 @100.7 mph. 1.81 60'

  4. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan00Hawk View Post
    If conditions are close to ideal, then it's possible. My 98 Formula once squeaked out a 13.32 at 104.5 mph (automatic trans). Typically, though it ran mid to high 13's when completely stock before I started modding it. I'd say it's "common" for the BEST ET for someone's LS1 F-body to be low 13's, but it may not "commonly" do it. People too often assume that a vehicle's best time is infinitely repeatable, when in all reality it may only do that once out of 50 times... Food for thought.
    Don't forget, because Evan Smith tested a 2002 SS at 12.90s that it means that all LS1 SSes run 12.90s!

  5. #49
    Registered User Dan00Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    759
    Quote Originally Posted by Flat 4 View Post
    Don't forget, because Evan Smith tested a 2002 SS at 12.90s that it means that all LS1 SSes run 12.90s!
    Of course! At least when discussing it on message boards!


    2007 VW GTI 6 spd. No times yet
    2000 Firehawk convertible 6spd- 12.52 @ 114.7 mph. 2.09 60'

    Sold: 2004 Mini Cooper S. 14.95 @ 93.8 mph.
    Sold: 2004 GTO 6 spd. 13.4 @ 104.5 mph
    Sold: 2002 WRX 5spd. 13.39 @100.7 mph. 1.81 60'

  6. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan00Hawk View Post
    Of course! At least when discussing it on message boards!
    Exactly!

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •