This is a discussion on Other Cars Without Turbos within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; Originally Posted by gastoys I would like to see Subaru put the flat 6 with a turbo in the Impreza ...
Why would you want to make the Impreza even more front-heavy? Getting that kind of power out of the current engine isn't that difficult anyway, but a lighter car with ~325hp would be much more fun. Personally, I'd rather have them keep the flat-4 w/ STi sized turbos and a slightly more aggressive factory tune and you're well into the 300s as far as power while keeping the lighter engine. I'll take less weight over added power any day of the week.
Follow the goddamn prompts!!!!! - Tech Support
'06 WRX TR Aspen White - SOLD
'96 Mazda Miata - Current Toy
Former Hawk-Eye Alliance #034
Each person has the thing that tickles their fancy - for some people it's turbos, for some people it's displacement, etc. BUT as far as competing cars that have AWD, subaru has certainly taken advances on providing some of the best AWD support. For reference, please watch the video provided below. Symmetrical AWD > other AWD.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OzK-oRPCbs
Float like a butterfly and sting like when I pee
OP: I would seriously recommend reading up on forced induction. Here's a place to start:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_induction
There is essentially only one way to increase the torque out of an internal combustion engine tremendously -- very broad, but somewhat applicable -- and that is to increase the amount of oxygen in the cylinders so more fuel can be combusted. There are two methods to accomplish this feat: 1. increase the displacement of the engine i.e. the GM LS-2 engine displaces 6 liters of volume to produce approx. 400 hp or 2. Forced induction whereas a turbo/supercharger physically forces air into the cylinders to create a similar situation. A WRX 2.0L with 14.7 PSI of boost (1 ATM) will be a stoichiometric equivalent to a naturally aspirated 4.0 L engine running at optimum efficiency IF the turbocharger doesn't create excess heat.
There are two problems with the last statement I made: First, a turbocharger is not at peak efficiency over the full RPM range. That is the turbo has an efficiency range that may be limited to approx. 4000 RPM over which the boost will be maximized. For a stock WRX, the efficiency range is about 2000 - 5500 RPM (I believe) therefore the power is robbed at redline. This can be remedied with a larger turbo, but at the expense of greater boost threshold and greater lag (worse driveability IMO). A supercharger will have a greater efficiency range, but is overall less efficient than a turbocharger due to the parasitic loss from the supercharger pulley. The second issue with the statement above is that I mentioned a 4.0 L engine running at optimum efficiency. This assumes that the naturally aspirated engine is operating as a perfect vacuum and equalizing to exactly atmospheric pressure in the cylinders. This does not occur without the aid of a passive forced induction system such as Ram Air. Furthermore, the absolute pressure in the cylinders decreases as the RPM increases because breathing is not as efficient at this rotational speed. Variable camshaft and valve lift timing aims to increase the volumetric efficiency at these RPM ranges, as does forced induction.
Clearly Subaru chose to take the small displacement/forced induction approach, mostly due to the fact that symmetrical AWD requires the engine to be stuffed in the very front of the car. A big GM LS engine would cause the car to be veryyy front heavy.
Last edited by zax; 05-04-2010 at 09:13 AM.
Zax' Shaggin' Wagon Build Thread Now tuned for 99% pure Unicorn Jizz!
Zach | Moderator -- Mid-Atlantic States, Tech & Modifying & General Repairs
The REAL 'WTF Tuning?!' Progenitor
Rollin' with the Bugeye Mafia #302 | N.E.R.D. Subject Zero | Blobeye Synd. #Tree-Fiddy
Facebook me here
Mods <---- drain savings account here
Originally Posted by Mikie13
Once again, another thread that has taught me some things I did not know.
One day I'll have a truly awesome sig
-------
2004 impreza WRX
uppipe, downpipe, ap, and a grin
~Blobeye syndicate~ #2007
Fantastic post Zax
2011 Honda CR-Z EX
Milano Red / Navigation / 6MT
2009 WRX hatch premium SEM #52 Traded 7/28/11
Kartboy STS & bushings // RedlineGoods Shifter & E-brake boots // Muffler delete pipe // Window tint //
Is it possible to make the WRX twin turbo?
Absolutely. But if you're sticking with a stock turbo it's pretty worthless to go with a twin scroll kit, from what I've read. You're spool time is already quick with the smaller turbos, so slapping two smaller turbos under the hood isn't going to be very beneficial.
If you're looking for faster spool times there are other mods you can do that are chaper than a twin scroll kit and more beneficial. An external wastegate setup, hi-flow cross pipe, port and polishing of your exhaust manifold, or ceramic coating are all great options to help your spool time and get more power from your stock setup.
Hawk-Eye Alliance #Eleventy,000,000,000|N.E.R.D. Member 20,000
Stable: 07 GMC 2500HD, 06 LGT, What's left of an 04 STI, 03 WRX, 98 RS, 86 Brat
Resident Clubdub Debbie Downer. I'd love your ideas if you kept them to yourself. Subarus suck, get a new wife.
If you mean twin turbo as in having two identical turbos then you could possibly do it, but it won't be cheap. I am not sure what you would have to do with the ECU though. It would be a big project indeed. My friend has a twin turbo BMW 335i and it is quick as hell.
Life is like riding a bicycle in order to keep your balance you must keep moving.
Hawk-Eye Alliance #Eleventy,000,000,000|N.E.R.D. Member 20,000
Stable: 07 GMC 2500HD, 06 LGT, What's left of an 04 STI, 03 WRX, 98 RS, 86 Brat
Resident Clubdub Debbie Downer. I'd love your ideas if you kept them to yourself. Subarus suck, get a new wife.
ugh i know ive seen a tt'ed wrx/sti before but i cant find it now
bugeye maffia member #304 l http://www.flickr.com/photos/joe_fonseca/
I agree about naturally aspirated engines getting boring after a while. Straight power all the way through gets old. I had an '04 GTO and it was fast but I got sick of it quick. Forced Induction is the way to go for the fun power band.
'09 Sti
Last edited by oguitar; 05-08-2010 at 11:46 PM.
Life is like riding a bicycle in order to keep your balance you must keep moving.
I would be fine with a car with a larger motor with a turbo placed further back.
I saw last night where a gorgeous 260z rotisserie restoration with a full 300zx swap sold for only $12K. While the purist in cringes slightly and the NA straight six was a joy in my 280, the claimed 400hp FI v6 sounds like it might do the trick.
"From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." - Dante
"The stitch is lost unless the thread is knotted." - Italian proverb
Bookmarks