What's faster...
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

This is a discussion on What's faster... within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; An 06 2.5i or a 98 RS, both stock....

  1. #1
    Registered User 321wings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    72

    What's faster...

    An 06 2.5i or a 98 RS, both stock.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    374
    they are both slow... but between the 2 I'd take the 2.5.
    04 Blobeye wagon
    AFE Filter, ebay catback.
    03 RR Evo sold

  4. #3
    Administrator Trainrex's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    26,593
    I Support ClubWRX
    Srt-4

  5. #4
    Registered User jomotopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    105
    a quick google search reveals the following specs:

    98 RS: 137 hp, 2825 lbs.
    06 2.5i: 173 hp, 2972 lbs (sedan/manual transmission)

    a little math shows the lbs/hp:

    98 RS: 20.62 lbs/hp
    06 2.5i: 17.18 lbs/hp

    so it looks like, in a straight line, the 06 2.5i would be a bit faster.

  6. #5
    Resident meany-rator 06wrx4me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Nor Cal
    Posts
    11,487
    I Support ClubWRX
    2014 Ford Fiesta ST

    06 WRX, HAWKEYE # 001 <T-boned and sold>

    COILOVER TABLE
    TURBO TABLE

  7. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by jomotopia View Post
    a quick google search reveals the following specs:

    98 RS: 137 hp, 2825 lbs.
    06 2.5i: 173 hp, 2972 lbs (sedan/manual transmission)

    a little math shows the lbs/hp:

    98 RS: 20.62 lbs/hp
    06 2.5i: 17.18 lbs/hp

    so it looks like, in a straight line, the 06 2.5i would be a bit faster.
    I don't think those numbers are accurate. The 2.5RS had 165 hp. I'm less sure about the curb weight but I don't believe it was that high either.

  8. #7
    Sammich Makin' Pwincess wrxtreme06's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    orlando flawduh
    Posts
    12,782
    I Support ClubWRX
    Quote Originally Posted by dan240 View Post
    I don't think those numbers are accurate. The 2.5RS had 165 hp. I'm less sure about the curb weight but I don't believe it was that high either.
    this is true!

    1999 RS standard features
    Phase II 2.5L engine 165 HP, 166 Torque @4000 rpm (same engine as 99 Forester)

    desiree
    your friendly, neighborhood subaru girl
    abbigale : 06 impreza wrx tr: cobb stage II
    hawkeye alliance #11:11//
    wingl3ss @ll!ance #17 // lvl 80 N.E.R.D.

  9. #8
    Registered User jomotopia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    105
    my mistake, i read the chart wrong. that was for the engine in the L. the RS does have 165 hp. curb weight was correct.

    so that makes the 98 RS 17.12 lbs/hp. so they're quite close.

    FYI i got my info here: Subaru Impreza Archives: 1997-1998

  10. #9
    Registered User 2.0Rs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    King of Prussia, Pa
    Posts
    1,168
    Quote Originally Posted by jomotopia View Post
    my mistake, i read the chart wrong. that was for the engine in the L. the RS does have 165 hp. curb weight was correct.

    so that makes the 98 RS 17.12 lbs/hp. so they're quite close.

    FYI i got my info here: Subaru Impreza Archives: 1997-1998
    You're also forgetting that the 98 Rs has a 4.11 final drive while the 06's are running 3.90's. Easily the 98 would win. Stock I ran a 15.4 with my 99'. With equal drivers the Rs's will always have the edge from gearing and weight.

  11. #10
    Registered User joesubaru7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    D-VILLE, PA
    Posts
    280
    I was running 15.5 in my 98. My brother has a 06 and i think i would've taken him.
    2006 WRX
    Opensource STG 2, Epic Engineering
    Hawk-Eye Alliance #032

    http://s258.photobucket.com/home/joesubaru7/index
    DD: 2001 2.5RS
    Old: 1998 2.5RS [url]

  12. #11
    Administrator RayfieldsWRX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    The Old Folks Home
    Posts
    47,044
    I Support ClubWRX
    The "who's faster" question should also be applied to handling, where I believe the lighter, more nimble GC8 would stand out.
    --Ray
    Grandfather of the Bugeye Mafia
    2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
    2002 Subaru WRX Bugeyebrid Wagon

  13. #12
    Registered User Blu_Scobbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Ellsworth, SD (for now...)
    Posts
    136

    Who's faster....?

    ...the one w/ the ej207 swap
    2004 Aspen White STi Mac Tuned Stage 2 *304whp/345wtq* (SOLD)
    2003 WRB WRX: VF30'd w/ XPT tune (TRADED!)
    2002 Berlina Black S2000: Mugen Exhaust (GONE)

+ Reply to Thread

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself. We strongly suggest that you stay away from using aol, yahoo, msn, and hotmail accounts. Sometimes the mail server blocks the emails from our server. As a result you will not receive any notifications including the confirmation email.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •