AWD v. RWD v. FWD
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

This is a discussion on AWD v. RWD v. FWD within the Comparison: WRX vs World forums, part of the Community - Meet other Enthusiasts category; Grassroots Motorsports magazine's latest issue (11/02) did a little test on different drivetrains. Representing their respective drivetrain layout were: the ...

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    1,613

    AWD v. RWD v. FWD

    Grassroots Motorsports magazine's latest issue (11/02) did a little test on different drivetrains. Representing their respective drivetrain layout were: the WRX (AWD); the RSX-S (FWD); and the BMW 330i. They were all shod with 205/55YR16 BFG KDW tires and run through a ~40 sec track at Michelin Tires' proving ground.

    The results were contrary to the conventional wisdom that RWD cars handle best: (average times)

    WRX times: 40.59 wet, 41.988 dry

    RSX-S times: 41.58 wet, 42.284 dry

    330i times: 42.02 wet, 42.44 dry (DSC off)
    42.218 wet, 43.982 dry (DSC on).

    The results from both the wet and dry testing reveal the Subaru Impreza WRX as the clear winner among these three cars. Its times were considerably quicker than the other two, while the car was easier to drive at the limit to boot. p. 38

  2. Remove Advertisements
    ClubWRX.net
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Registered User QuickSilver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    1,294
    I read that same article...AWD kicks Arse!

    Didn't they also have a technical guy who went over each major aspect of handling and his opinion on which of the 3 set-ups would be best theoretically? Even in theory, it sounded like AWD is a superior set-up...all things equal, AWD should win every time....well in theory that is, but the article did do actual road test in some limited fashion and the WRX ruled!
    '02 Plat. Wagon, Manual

  4. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    77
    I read that article too.....pretty sweet article. To me, it makes me just want to be patient and keep saving for my WRX even more......Especially when it beats a BMW 330i, which is considered one of the best handling cars around under 50 grand....at least to my knowledge.
    Too bad I couldn't afford a WRX, but life goes on........hopefully......

  5. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Indy
    Posts
    766
    I'm actually amazed that the RSX-S did better than the 330i...I always thought BMW was one of the benchmarks for handling.

    Doesn't suprise me that the WRX won so handly...almost a half-second of dry and a full second on the wet course. Guess all those guys that have said "yea, but I'll race you in the rain, snow, sleet, etc..." have spoken the truth about their cars!

    The WRX is a bad-ass car...but I must admit, after seeing this, maybe the RSX-S should get a little more credit. Yes, I'm biased...but coming in with the least amount of hp and supposedly the worst handling, that isn't too shabby. Honda needs to get with the program and offer LSD or something to that effect to improve its handling characteristics though...
    2005 NBP Accord EX-V6 6MT
    AEM CAI, HFP aerokit, Comptech SS
    17" Enkei RS7s on YokoES100 tires

  6. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    410
    Interesting article but I wouldn't use it as a basis for saying AWD > FWD > RWD. I drive a FWD car and I still realize that everything else being equal, FWD is the worst layout for any type of performance competition. Doesn't mean the handicap can't be overcome but it is still a handicap.

    Between AWD and RWD I'm still on the fence about which is better performance wise though. Although in streetable race cars, AWD has proven itself to be quite a remarkable platform, there MUST be a reason why the fastest racecars in the world (F1/Indy/even NASCAR) use RWD. I don't believe it is because AWD was banned in those competitions, though I guess I could be wrong.
    2002 RSX Type S
    Anyone want to buy my car?

  7. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    OC
    Posts
    55
    There's nothing wrong with FWD performance as long as the platform is on a light chasis. The Integra Type R is a good example of this. They do quite well in the touring class. However, when the horsepower increase, it's more prone to torque steer. When weight is increase, it's more prone to understeer. None of this is desirable when it comes to an all out performance platform.

    Happy Mortoring...BlueMax

  8. #7
    Registered User KJ0813's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    48
    I still go back to the fact that for just about all pro non-rally track racing (F1, LeMans, etc..) the cars are RWD. Acceleration physics are on the side of RWD; it's better for powersliding and drifting. I need no magazine to tell me otherwise, my own track experiences tell me that.

    I've never driven a FWD I could really trust in the twisties. On the street, fine, for most people. At the track, forget it, I just don't like the "plowing" effect of FWD cars. Maybe that's just my personal preference, but I know I am much faster with RWD.

    Having said that, I do wonder about AWD. I am buying one soon(although with the EVO VIII coming I am torn between the Rexxie and the EVO), and I can't wait to see what I can do with one.
    I own various Miatas and RX-7's in race trim
    One or two of them actually run now :-)
    Soon to posess a Scooby...

  9. #8
    Registered User ScoobySteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    831
    Originally posted by KJ0813
    I still go back to the fact that for just about all pro non-rally track racing (F1, LeMans, etc..) the cars are RWD. Acceleration physics are on the side of RWD; it's better for powersliding and drifting. I need no magazine to tell me otherwise, my own track experiences tell me that.

    AWD is just fine on the track for drifting. Not to mention the strong drive you get out of the turns. Drive a WRX on the track and I guarantee you'll get out of the car with a smile on your face.

    Not sure why we don't see AWD in LeMans / upper levels of sportscar racing. Perhaps the rules don't allow it. Certainly it's extra weight and mechanical complexity - just more things that can break during a long race. You do see Audi A4's in the Speed Channel GT races. They seem reasonably competitive against the Porsches, Corvettes, etc. but I think they artificially balance things out in that series with weight penalties and so on.
    Last edited by ScoobySteve; 10-14-2002 at 09:42 PM.
    Old, but not slow.

  10. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    1,613
    Powersliding and drifting in F1 and LeMans?

  11. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    90
    Handling is all about the car doing exactly the driver's input and the most important thing is that the car's behaviour is telepathic.

    RWD Powerslides and a slightly oversteer bias is actually desired for by many competitive drivers who want max control of their cars so they could get more turn-in when required. Even the Type-Rs of the past generations like DC2 and EK9 have had their FWD layout and suspensiion tuned to be oversteery on lift-off when required to tuck the car into line.

    For a great RWD handling car to happen, its almost certain that BIGGER tyres are required in the back to get more grip.

    In my opinion though, nothing beats AWD, especially when wet!! Well, may be the Skyline GTR's 2+2 ATTESA system and HICAS four wheel steer
    "S15 Silvia - Are you enjoying the view from the side?"

  12. #11
    Registered User Retro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    USA, FL
    Posts
    827
    Don't be unfair, that 4wheel steer is just too fricken much. Anyways, the fwd can be tuned to work well in short twisties as you can pull some bad azz turns at low speed; you just need a light chassis. The rwd is good for oversteer, and awd can do the same thing, but add some control in it. I would have to say though that for all these types of drive systems, the major contributing factor to how it responds is the weight distribution. An even distribution can give a more neutral feeling to awd, rear to fwd, front to rwd. 50/50 weight is not always desireable.

  13. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    90
    Yeah I've read that cars that used to have exact 50/50 weight distribution are actually quite hard to catch when they're just over the limit. Its better to have a front biase, and then use tyre alignment set-ups to counter it!

    But if you think a WRX is GOD thru the corners, wait til u drive the STi with the Suretrac Diff in the front - nothing except the EVO VII comes close!
    "S15 Silvia - Are you enjoying the view from the side?"

  14. #13
    Registered User WRXed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Macon, GA
    Posts
    3,073
    Originally posted by Iruka
    In my opinion though, nothing beats AWD, especially when wet!! Well, may be the Skyline GTR's 2+2 ATTESA system and HICAS four wheel steer
    You remind me of a write-up in one of my older Popular Mechanics about a Mercedes with active camber. In corners the camber would automatically adjust to keep the best traction. Of course, we'll never see it in the US. Well, even if we did, I'd never be able to afford it.
    All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my hand. - Steven Wright

    Moderator, of the "Super" persuasion

  15. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    90
    If u know how much effort has actually been put into the EVO VII's YAW and ACD system u'll probably wonder why the heck mercs bother with any camber adjusting function or the active suspension systems!

    I can't believe how the EVO VII can beat the STi and GTRs in the corners until I saw them race in the wet!
    "S15 Silvia - Are you enjoying the view from the side?"

  16. #15
    Registered User JTREX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    567
    Some of the more famous AWD cars, http://4wd.sofcom.com/ClassicCars/Racing.html[/URL]

    Audi dominated trans-am racing in the 80's for a few years, IMSA kept adding weight to the cars until Audi said enough and left the series. They were wicked cars.
    Drag racing? I like my racing to last longer than the average orgasm...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself. We strongly suggest that you stay away from using aol, yahoo, msn, and hotmail accounts. Sometimes the mail server blocks the emails from our server. As a result you will not receive any notifications including the confirmation email.

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •