View Single Post
Old 11-27-2008, 05:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
all-motor_turbo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texhasass
Posts: 13
Send a message via AIM to all-motor_turbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2:43AM View Post
OK, the results are as follows:

Tank #1 (Cobb Econo) - 340mi - 26.3mpg
Tank #2 (Stage 1-91) - 342mi - 26.6mpg

Results? I think it's pretty self-explanitory. Cobb Econo map simply does not work, at all. In fact, given the terrain in which Stage 1-91 experienced, it is worse.
of course it doesnt work. i dont know if you guys know but mpg is all dependent on vaccum manifold pressure and throttle position. if you go to cobb's site they tell you exactly what the map does and what updates they have done. which is pretty much nothing. the only way you can get great gas mileage is running much leaner while in cruise and drive at a consistent speed for the longest period time possible.
all-motor_turbo is offline   Reply With Quote